Incidence, mortality and relative survival of patients with cancer of the bladder and upper urothelial tract in the Nordic countries between 1990 and 2019.

PURPOSE: To understand the potential impact of new treatment options for urinary tract cancer, recent population trends in incidence, mortality and survival should be elucidated. This study estimated changes in the incidence, mortality and relative survival of urinary tract cancer in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) between 1990 and 2019. METHODS: Annual counts of incident cases and deaths due to urinary tract cancer (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes C65-C68, D09.0-D09.1, D30.1-D30.9 and D41.1-D41.9) in Nordic countries were retrieved in 5-year age categories by sex during the study period. Country-specific time trends (annual rate ratios [RRs]) were estimated using Poisson regression, and RRs were compared between sexes. RESULTS: The incidence rate of bladder and upper urothelial tract cancer was >3-times lower in women than men in all countries across all age groups (incidence RR for women to men ranging from 0.219 [95% CI = 0.213-0.224] in Finland to 0.291 [95% CI = 0.286-0.296] in Denmark). Incidence rates were lowest in Finland and highest in Norway and Denmark. Age-adjusted mortality decreased in Finland, Denmark and Norway and in Swedish men, with the greatest decrease seen in Danish men (annual RR = 0.976; 95% CI = 0.975-0.978). In all countries and age groups, women had a lower relative survival rate than men. CONCLUSION: Between 1990 and 2019, the incidence of urinary tract cancer was stable in the Nordic countries, while mortality rates declined and relative survival increased. This could be due to earlier diagnosis and better treatment.

Biweekly Cabazitaxel Is a Safe Treatment Option for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients After Docetaxel - A Final Analysis of the Prosty II Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Our phase III trial showed that biweekly docetaxel (D) is better tolerated than triweekly D in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The safety of biweekly cabazitaxel (CBZ) post-docetaxel was studied in mCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Altogether, 60 patients received CBZ 16 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and day 14 of a 4-week cycle. The mean serum PSA levels were 305 ng/ml, and the mean age 67 years. The primary endpoint was safety according to CTCAEv4.0. RESULTS: A total of 255 4-week cycles of CBZ were administered. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (16.7%), pain (13.3%), fatigue (10.0%), anemia (5.0%) and non-neutropenic infection (10.0%). PSA responses occurred in 10 patients (16.7%). Clinical benefit rate was 38.3% and median survival 10 months. CONCLUSION: Biweekly CBZ is a well-tolerated treatment resulting in meaningful benefits for heavily pretreated mCRPC patients.

Evolving Clinical Picture of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study from Helsinki.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of detailed population-based data for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to examine the contemporary changes in the clinical picture and treatment of RCC. METHODS: A total of 1,719 consecutive patients living in the Helsinki metropolitan area with a solid or cystic renal mass (Bosniak 3-4) ≥10 mm were identified. Data from medical records was evaluated for clinical characteristics and treatments in the periods I (2006-2008), II (2009-2011), III (2012-2014), and IV (2015-2016). RESULTS: The proportions of patients with comorbidities (Charlson index ≥2) and frailty (Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group classification ≥2) increased significantly during the study period. The percentage of clinical stage I patients, cystic tumors and use of needle biopsies increased significantly. Use of observation increased from 9% (I) to 32% (IV; p < 0.001). First-line oncological treatments within 6 months were given to 47% of 262 patients with metastases and -cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was delivered to 54% of those patients. CONCLUSIONS: The size of renal tumors continued to decrease, while the percentage of patients with significant comorbidity or frailty increased. Active surveillance emerged as the initial strategy. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors with CN remained the primary option in patients with metastatic RCC.

The clinical impact of using complex molecular profiling strategies in routine oncology practice.

Molecular profiling and functional assessment of signalling pathways of advanced solid tumours are becoming increasingly available. However, their clinical utility in guiding patients' treatment remains unknown. Here, we assessed whether molecular profiling helps physicians in therapeutic decision making by analysing the molecular profiles of 1057 advanced cancer patient samples after failing at least one standard of care treatment using a combination of next-generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and other specific tests. The resulting information was interpreted and personalized treatments for each patient were suggested. Our data showed that NGS alone provided the oncologist with useful information in 10-50% of cases (depending on cancer type), whereas the addition of IHC/other tests increased extensively the usefulness of the information provided. Using internet surveys, we investigated how therapy recommendations influenced treatment choice of the oncologist. For patients who were still alive after the provision of the molecular information (76.8%), 60.4% of their oncologists followed report recommendations. Most treatment decisions (93.4%) were made based on the combination of NGS and IHC/other tests, and an approved drug- rather than clinical trial enrolment- was the main treatment choice. Most common reasons given by physicians to explain the non-adherence to recommendations were drug availability and cost, which remain barriers to personalised precision medicine. Finally, we observed that 27% of patients treated with the suggested therapies had an overall survival > 12 months. Our study demonstrates that the combination of NGS and IHC/other tests provides the most useful information in aiding treatment decisions by oncologists in routine clinical practice.

Multimodal Primary Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Androgen Deprivation and Radiation.

AIM: We combined anti-androgen therapy with radiotherapy in a first-line setting for metastatic prostate cancer aiming to cause maximal cancer-cell death to delay the emergence of castration-resistant disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this non-randomized retrospective series of 46 patients, the initial median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 98.5 µg/l (range=6.7-15,500), median Gleason score 9 and most men had at least T3N1M1 disease. All patients received luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog or degarelix with bicalutamide. If PSA remained above 1 µg/l, docetaxel was initiated. At PSA nadir, all patients received radical radiotherapy of the prostate. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 4.38 years (range=0.36-11.24). Most radiotherapy-related adverse events were grade 1 and transient. There were no grade 4 events. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 81.3%. CONCLUSION: The feasibility and safety of aggressive multimodality treatment were good resulting in an excellent median OS of 8.35 years.

2-Weekly versus 3-weekly docetaxel to treat castration-resistant advanced prostate cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel administered every 3 weeks is a standard treatment for castration-resistant advanced prostate cancer. We hypothesised that 2-weekly administration of docetaxel would be better tolerated than 3-weekly docetaxel in patients with castration-resistant advanced prostate cancer, and did a prospective, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 study to compare efficacy and safety. METHODS: Eligible patients had advanced prostate cancer (metastasis, a prostate-specific-antigen test result of more than 10·0 ng/mL, and WHO performance status score of 0-2), had received no chemotherapy (except with estramustine), had undergone surgical or chemical castration, and had been referred to a treatment centre in Finland, Ireland, or Sweden. Enrolment and treatment were done between March 1, 2004, and May 31, 2009. Randomisation was done centrally and stratified by centre and WHO performance status score of 0-1 vs 2. Patients were assigned 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel intravenously on day 1 of a 3-week cycle, or 50 mg/m(2) docetaxel intravenously on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. 10 mg oral prednisolone was administered daily to all patients. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTTF). We assessed data in the per-protocol population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00255606. FINDINGS: 177 patients were randomly assigned to the 2-weekly docetaxel group and 184 to the 3-weekly group. 170 patients in the 2-weekly group and 176 in the 3-weekly group were included in the analysis. The 2-weekly administration was associated with significantly longer TTTF than was 3-weekly administration (5·6 months, 95% CI 5·0-6·2 vs 4·9 months, 4·5-5·4; hazard ratio 1·3, 95% CI 1·1-1·6, p=0·014). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred more frequently in the 3-weekly than in the 2-weekly administration group, including neutropenia (93 [53%] vs 61 [36%]), leucopenia (51 [29%] vs 22 [13%]), and febrile neutropenia (25 [14%] vs six [4%]). Neutropenic infections were reported more frequently in patients who received docetaxel every 3 weeks (43 [24%] vs 11 [6%], p=0·002). INTERPRETATION: Administration of docetaxel every 2 weeks seems to be well tolerated in patients with castration-resistant advanced prostate cancer and could be a useful option when 3-weekly single-dose administration is unlikely to be tolerated. FUNDING: Sanofi.

No additional benefit of adding ifosfamide to docetaxel in castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of many types of cancer, combination chemotherapy has been shown to be better than single-agent chemotherapy. The aim of our phase I-II clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel-ifosfamide combination chemotherapy in patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients were enrolled to receive first-line chemotherapy consisting of 40-60 mg/m(2) docetaxel followed by 3.0 g/m(2) ifosfamide with mesna. All drugs were administered intravenously. The maximum duration of the chemotherapy was six cycles. The median age of the patients was 70 (range 58-82) years. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) responses were determined according to the PSA working group guidelines and all toxicities, time-to-progression and overall survival were determined according to the WHO criteria. RESULTS: The objective PSA response rate was 32% in 11/31 patients. The mean PSA value at baseline was 300 (range 2.5-1577) µg/l. The overall median survival was 14.1 months; 15 patients were alive at a median follow-up time of 18 months. The observed side-effects were as expected, with grade 3-4 neutropenia developing in 38% of the cycles, whereas febrile neutropenia occurred in only 12% of the patients. The median number of administered cycles was 4.8. No acute hypersensitivity reactions were observed. Transient renal insufficiency developed in two patients, thus necessitating dose reductions. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel and ifosfamide seems to be well-tolerated and has some activity in patients with CRPC. However, newer docetaxel-based combination chemotherapy regimens need to be further developed in other to provide more efficacious and well-tolerated treatment options for earlier phases of CRPC.

Biweekly docetaxel is better tolerated than conventional three-weekly dosing for advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel administered every three weeks is the standard treatment for advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). However, biweekly administration might be better tolerated due to the reduced peak drug concentrations. Therefore, we compared biweekly to triweekly docetaxel as first- or second-line chemotherapy for advanced HRPC in this prospective randomized multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 360 patients were randomly allocated to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) i.v. d1 q3 weeks (tT) or 50 mg/m(2) i.v. d1 and d 14, q4 weeks (bT) from March 2004 to May 2009. Oral prednisolone (10 mg/day) was administered in both groups. The groups were well balanced according to the WHO performance status in terms of mean age (70 vs. 68, range 45-87 years) and median serum PSA level at the time of study entry (109 vs. 98 µg/l, range 11-1490 µg/l). The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). ClinicalTrials.gov study identifier: NCT00255606. RESULTS: Ultimately, 158 patients (tT=79; bT=79) were included in this preplanned interim safety analysis; 567 and 487 cycles (equivalent to 1701 and 1948 weeks of treatment) were administered in the tT and bT groups, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (expressed as %/cycles) in tT /bT were neutropenia 20%/14%; infection with/without neutropenia 8%/3%; fatigue 3%/3%; febrile neutropenia 2%/1%; and bone pain 2%/1%. Serious adverse events occurred more frequently in the group tT (n=60, 10.6% of cycles) than in the group bT (n=29, 6.0%, p=0.012). One patient died due to coronary infarction, and another was diagnosed with acute lymphocytic leukemia (both in the bT group). Thirty patients (38%) in the bT group and 22 patients (28%) in the tT group were still receiving treatment at 6 months (p=0.176). CONCLUSION: Biweekly docetaxel was tolerated better than conventional triweekly with fewer serious adverse events and more patients were still on the therapy at 6 months. Biweekly docetaxel therapy might be considered as an option for elderly patients exhibiting a compromised general condition.